0

DUI And The Sixth Amendment: Lab Scientist Who Signed Report Must Testify, Not Colleague.

Posted by on Aug 1, 2011 in Drunk driving, DUI, Expert testimony, Sixth Amendment

The Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause gives the accused in all criminal prosecutions, the right, to be confronted with the witnesses against him. For anyone practicing in the area of DUI and drunk driving, the United States Supreme Court in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, (Slip opinion, June 2011), addressed the issue of “whether the Confrontation Clause [...]

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
0

Nevada Clarifies Statutory Procedure For Determining Defendant Mentally Retarded

If you intend to argue that your client is of insufficient mental intelligence in order to avoid the death penalty, Nevada requires proof from before the defendant turned 18, which demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she suffered from “significant subaverage intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior deficits.” In Ybarra v. State [...]

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
0

Admissibility of Statements When Expert Witness Unavailable

Posted by on Sep 28, 2010 in Confrontation clause, Expert testimony, Sixth Amendment

Under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the testimonial statement of an otherwise unavailable witness is inadmissible “unless the defendant had an opportunity to previously cross-examine the witness regarding the witness’s statement.” Medina v. State, 122 Nev. 346, 353, 143 P.3d 471, 476 (2006). Recently, in Vega v. State, (126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. [...]

Tags: , , , , ,

 
0

Expert Testimony, Hallmark v. Eldridge Revisited

Posted by on Feb 3, 2010 in Expert testimony

In Higgs v. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 1 (2010), the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the issue of admissibility of expert testimony and clarified an inconsistency (real or perceived) in its prior ruling on the topic: Hallmark v. Eldridge, 189 P.3d 646 (Nev. 2008). A couple of things are clear after Higgs: 1. Nevada only [...]

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
0

Expert Testimony

Posted by on Aug 17, 2009 in Expert testimony, Trial

In 2008, the Nevada Supreme Court, in Hallmark v. Eldridge, 189 P.3d 646 (Nev. 2008) clarified the status of Nevada law relative to the admissibility of expert testimony. In Hallmark, the court began by stating, “The statute governing the admissibility of expert testimony in Nevada district courts is NRS 50.275…” Id. at 650. If a [...]

Tags: , , , ,

Copyright © 2012 Nevada Trial Practice Blog All rights reserved.
Desk Mess Mirrored v1.4.1 theme from BuyNowShop.com.